automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Modernize, improve and/or tweak various test scripts.


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modernize, improve and/or tweak various test scripts.
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 11:44:44 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )

On Sunday 07 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 11:18:49AM CET:
> > On Sunday 07 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:22:37AM CEST:
> 
> > > > * tests/ctarget1.test: Renamed ...
> > > 
> > > Please don't rename tests unless for a very good reason,
> > The good reason is IMHO that the name `ctarget1.test' is misleading
> > w.r.t. the testcase's content.
> 
> Hmm, well, maybe.
> 
> > > and please don't reuse names from tests that have been removed.
> > I didn't (we had alredy agreed that this would be bad practice); to
> > verify that I'm speaking truth, try:
> >   $ git lgl master -- tests/cond1.test
> > There should be no output (works for me).
> 
> The test might not ever have made it to revision control,
In this case I don't see any problem, no?
> or it might have been in a non-merged branch only
> (so use --all to look).
Ah, didn't think of that, sorry.
Luckily, even with "git log --all", the only menstion of
`tests/cond1.test' is in my temporary branch.
> In case of doubt, at least use a name not likely to have been
> used before.   Anyway cond1 also hints me that this is a very
> old test.
And it is (ctarget1.test was created in February 2001)
> 
> > So, ok to proceed with the rename?
> 
> Please use a new name if you must.
I used the new name `cond-basic.test' (again, "git log --all" tells
me that it is safe).

Regards,
  Stefano



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]