[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Lex, Yacc and explicit declarations of dependencies.

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Lex, Yacc and explicit declarations of dependencies.
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:08:30 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22)

Hi Stefano,

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:36:03PM CEST:
> I rebased the patch series against master to resolve some (really 
> minor) conflicts; and since I was at it, I updated the ChangeLog to 
> tell that the bug addressed by this series affects also Solaris 10 
> /usr/xpg4/bin/make (apparently /usr/ccs/make is *not* affected).
> No significant, "real" change was introduced by the rebasing.
> Do you want me to repost the updated series, or to open a new branch
> in the Automake official repository and push the patches there?  This 
> last option would be better IMHO, because the changes introduced by 
> this series might be seen as somewhat controversial, so the merge in 
> master might not happen soon (in fact, might not happen *at all*); and 
> having a remote branch would help in avoiding the bitrotting of the 
> series.

Please give me another week to review the series; for that, it shouldn't
be necessary to post updated patches nor push a branch; I have your
patches in an old branch sitting here.  If you haven't heard back from
me by next Monday, then feel free to push a branch, but please rebase it
against maint not master, if that is at all possible for the changes in
this series.

> If I'm not mistaken, a remote branch can be deleted anyway in 
> the future (in case it turns out to be a dead end).

Yes, that is true.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]