automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:15:04 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; )

At Monday 21 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano, 
> I'm falling more and more behind on patches, it seems.
In this last period, it seems quite the opposite to me :-)
Thanks for your work!

I've just a minor nit about the follow-up patch...

>  Ensure generated C files contain a declaration, to please
>  compilers.
This is good, and I should have thought about it in the first
place.  On the other hand...
>  Prefer `make -e' over `make VAR=VAL', to please
>  maintainer-check.
... are we sure we want to relax the tests just to please maintainer-check?
After all, those tests were working correctly with both GNU and BSD make,
and (mostly) with Solaris and Heirloom make (with failures due to those
make implementations bypassing the Automake-generated ".y => .c => .o"
rule chain in favor of their own ".y => .o" built-in rule, but that's
another story).

I think it's time to make `maintainer-check' more configurable and
whitelist-friendly.  And there's no need to remain anchored to grep and
sed: since we can assume that perl is available, we can as well use all
its power...

Maybe I can come up with a tentative/proof-of-concept patch along
this line in a few days.  But this is an argument for another thread,
obviously.

Regards,
    Stefano



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]