automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposed patch: parallel-tests: also record logs of SKIPped tests.


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: proposed patch: parallel-tests: also record logs of SKIPped tests.
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:34:19 +0100


Le 19 mars 09 à 23:17, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :

Hi Jim,

* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:07:15PM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This is a patch that I don't know whether I want it or not.
Package authors may be interested in SKIPs and why they happen, or not.
(Could also be solved with leaving the choice to the package author
and/or user, by some TEST_RECORD_SKIPS variable or so).

Comments appreciated.

Yes, please.

Once I taught coreutils' "make check" to tell why a test is skipped,
I discovered a few that should not have been skipped.
Seeing a summary (and remembering the numbers) might help too.

Yes, I agree.  The thing is, though, that there may be an abundance of
SKIPs; all of which are hopefully not very interesting.  For example,
the Automake testsuite itself can easily skip a good part of its tests
when on an unusual host (that in itself is probably a bad thing, but
that's for another thread ...).

Maybe putting the logs of the skips last would limit the clutter sufficiently?

The question is whether there should be a toggle to enable or disable
logging SKIPs, or they should always be logged, and if a toggle, what
color that bikeshed^Wtoggle should have.

I take that back.  User API questions are never really bike shedding.

Browsing the result of check-html is nice and it is then easy to go from one place to another.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]