Re: proposed patch to support Unified Parallel C (version 3 of patch)

[Jonathan Higa]

On 8/4/06, Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> wrote:
> Congratulations on the patch, and thanks for making it complete.
> It looks great, but I can see a couple of minor problems.  My
> main complaint is that your tests do not show that building a
> upc program actually work.


Here is a Version 4 which should fix everything noted in the previous
message, but there's at least one new problem that I don't know how to fix.
I added AC_PROG_CC in AM_PROG_UPC to force OBJEXT into Makefile.in; without
it, upc.test will fail.  What's the right way to guarantee OBJEXT in the
output without hunting for an unnecessary compiler?

automake-upc-v4.patch
Description: Text Data