[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no-dist-gzip
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: no-dist-gzip |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jun 2003 23:55:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> Gzip is really a pain in my case. I'm suggesting this first stab.
Akim> Possible debates:
Akim> 1. a warning when no-dist-gzip but no option to enable another format?
Akim> 2. if so, where?
handle_dist?
Akim> 3. a better message at the end of distcheck? It no longer gives the
Akim> name of an archive.
Someone once complained that project.tar.bz2 was not mentioned
in that banner (when using dist-bzip2).
I think it would be a useful to let Automake output a variable
with the list of archives constructed by dist. Maybe something
like
DIST_ARCHIVES = $(distdir).tar.gz $(distdir).tar.bz2
But this is another story.
[...]
Akim> (distcheck): Depend upon distdir, not dist.
Akim> Run make dist at the end.
I'm feeling a bit uneasy with this. Basically, the change is
that you pack what has been checked, instead of checking what
has been packed. Not that this makes a very important
difference, but I'm disturbed to think that the package I
distribute was never unpacked. (I know this is what happens
with tar.bz2 packages presently, only tar.gz are checked, yet
I feel like checking one archive is better than nothing.)
By the way, do you know why all these `dist-*' targets
are conditionally defined?
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- no-dist-gzip, Akim Demaille, 2003/06/02
- Re: no-dist-gzip,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=