[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 2]
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 2] |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:45:46 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
Any way lt-foo.c could go into .libs/? Or just be erased after
foo.exe has been built? Maybe both?
I see no problems with either or both...but I'd rather keep lt-foo.c
around until 'make clean' (or libtool --mode=clean) time.
Also I if you don't move `foo' to `.libs/' I think you
should ensure that `libtool --mode=clean rm -f foo.exe'
erases `foo'.
Good point. "libtool --mode=clean" won't currently get both of them.
But automake's 'make clean' will (see below).
(Or does Cygwin's `rm' erase both at once?)
No, it doesn't.
Right now Automake doesn't use `--mode=clean'. Maybe Automake
1.8 could start doing this so we don't have to hardcode this
sort of knowledge.
Yeah, I think this has come up before...
However, current automake "make clean" will at least attempt to delete
all four of the following, whether they exist or not:
foo
foo.exe
.libs/foo (*)
.libs/foo.exe (*)
(*) by virtue of rm -rf'ing .libs
So, there's really no worry about cleaning up the shell wrapper or the
"real" executable -- or the binary wrapper -- with present automake.
But cleaning up the lt-foo.c file is an issue. I'd prefer to move it
into .libs, but NOT erase it; automake's make clean will "get it" if
it's in .libs (see rm -rf, above)
'Course, transitioning to libtool --mode=clean will mess that up, unless
the problems you mention are addressed...
--Chuck
- Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem, Charles Wilson, 2003/01/07
- Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/01/09
- Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem, Charles Wilson, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem, Earnie Boyd, 2003/01/09
- Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/01/09
- Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 2], Charles Wilson, 2003/01/11
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 2], Earnie Boyd, 2003/01/12
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 2], Charles Wilson, 2003/01/12
- Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 2], Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/01/12
- Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 2],
Charles Wilson <=
- Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 3], Charles Wilson, 2003/01/13
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem [take 3], Earnie Boyd, 2003/01/20
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem[take 3], Bruce Korb, 2003/01/20
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem[take 3], Charles Wilson, 2003/01/20
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem[take3], Bruce Korb, 2003/01/20
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Solving the "relink exe's" libtool problem[take3], Charles Wilson, 2003/01/20