Re: FYI: depout.m4 adjustment for post-processed Makefile.ins

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:

adl> - Debian Bug#144221: dejagnu.am build site.exp and site.bak, and never
adl>   erase these files.  Hence `make distcheck' always fails. 

I wrote a patch.  I don't have a test case though.

What do you think?  I was undecided whether I should start using the
new naming scheme ("am--distclean-dejagnu") or whether to keep using
the old scheme and just plan a big rename in the future.

Tom

Index: ChangeLog
from  Tom Tromey  <address@hidden>

        * lib/am/dejagnu.am (distclean-DEJAGNU): New target.

Index: lib/am/dejagnu.am
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/lib/am/dejagnu.am,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 dejagnu.am
--- lib/am/dejagnu.am 2 Oct 2001 16:00:03 -0000 1.16
+++ lib/am/dejagnu.am 26 Apr 2002 17:16:27 -0000
@@ -94,3 +94,15 @@
        @-rm -f site.bak
        @test ! -f site.exp || mv site.exp site.bak
        @mv site.tmp site.exp
+
+## ---------- ##
+## Cleaning.  ##
+## ---------- ##
+
+.PHONY distclean-am: distclean-DEJAGNU
+
+distclean-DEJAGNU:
+## Any other cleaning must be done by the user or by the test suite
+## itself.  We can't predict what dejagnu or the test suite might
+## generate.
+       -rm -f site.exp site.bak