[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch: couple of doc updates
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Patch: couple of doc updates |
Date: |
17 Feb 2002 19:02:13 -0700 |
>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
adl> I'm committing this patch. With all the FIXMEs.
Thanks. I started reading the patch but ran out of time. I meant to
tell you to check it in but never got around to it.
adl> | Automake tries to group comments with adjoining targets and macro
adl> | definitions in an intelligent way.
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: What does this imply practically?
Hopefully it is slightly easier to read the Makefile.in.
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: This is broken today: &am_primary_prefix will allow
data_PROGRAMS
adl> |address@hidden because $datadir is defined before Makefile.am is parsed.
This
adl> |address@hidden means that passing the list of allowed directory suffix to
adl> |address@hidden &am_install_var or &am_primary_prefix is absolutely
useless (except
adl> |address@hidden for 'noinst', 'check' and friends).
Please submit a PR for this.
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: maybe Automake could bark if a developer forces a
user variable
adl> |address@hidden from Makefile.am.
This sounds like a good idea to me. I see this mistake made quite a
bit. OTOH I wonder if it will just generate a lot of complaints.
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: As all the Hello World excerpts in this manual, this
adl> |address@hidden shows deprecated features (here: $(INCLUDES)).
The examples in the manual haven't been updated in a long time.
The bigger the example, the less up-to-date it probably is.
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: This seems to be a left-over from Automake 1.4,
unused today.
Yes, we ought to deprecate this. It used to be used by `make dist'.
Could you submit a PR for this too?
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: Consider not documenting these internal macros.
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: Consider not documenting this internal macro.
adl> |address@hidden FIXME: Consider not documenting this internal macro.
Maybe we could mention them in a separate node with a note saying
"don't use these, and if you do you're screwed in the next release".
Thanks again for writing this patch.
Tom