automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Imprecise documentation -- uninstall-hook


From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Subject: Re: Imprecise documentation -- uninstall-hook
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:10:33 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)

>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:

 >>>>>> "Paolo" == Bonzini  <address@hidden> writes:
 Paolo> The manual refers to a non-existent uninstall-hook target.
 Paolo> The attached patch fixes it.

 Tom> Thanks, I'm checking this in.

The code still recomends to use uninstall-hook :)

2001-12-31  Alexandre Duret-Lutz  <address@hidden>

        * automake.in (handle_factored_dependencies): Tell the user to use
        uninstall-local instead of uninstall-data-hook,
        uninstall-exec-hook, or uninstall-hook.


Index: automake.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/automake.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1252
diff -u -r1.1252 automake.in
--- automake.in 2001/12/31 09:19:33     1.1252
+++ automake.in 2001/12/31 10:06:43
@@ -4225,12 +4225,14 @@
 {
     # Reject bad hooks.
     foreach my $utarg ('uninstall-data-local', 'uninstall-data-hook',
-                      'uninstall-exec-local', 'uninstall-exec-hook')
+                      'uninstall-exec-local', 'uninstall-exec-hook',
+                      'uninstall-hook')
     {
        if (&target_defined ($utarg))
        {
            my $x = $utarg;
            $x =~ s/(data|exec)-//;
+           $x =~ s/hook/local/;
            target_error ($utarg, "use `$x', not `$utarg'");
        }
     }


-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]