[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conditionally using libtool
From: |
Bob Rossi |
Subject: |
Re: conditionally using libtool |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:15:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:09:19AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Bob Rossi wrote on Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:00:03AM CEST:
> >
> > Can I do something in configure.in that says
> > if ..
> > AM_LIBTOOL
> > fi;
> >
> > or is this invalid?
>
> This is invalid and will break at unfortunate places.
> Use AC_PROG_LIBTOOL unconditionally (who told you to name it
> AM_LIBTOOL?) and conditionalize in Makefile.am. At most, something like
> AS_IF([condition],
> [AC_PROG_LIBTOOL])
>
> may not totally break with upcoming Autoconf-2.60; but I have not tested
> that nor verified it in any way, so consider yourself warned.
Thanks for the advice. This was definatly a typo on my part. I'm using
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. However, I was burned before by putting a macro in an
'if' statement. I was wondering if it was OK to use AC_PROG_LIBTOOL in
an if statement.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
- conditionally using libtool, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/28
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Russ Allbery, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool,
Bob Rossi <=
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Russ Allbery, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/30
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Russ Allbery, 2006/04/30