[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: portable way to trap SIGCHLD?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: portable way to trap SIGCHLD? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:21:13 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> Are there any systems where there are no accessible versions of kill(1)
> which can convert either a single signal name to number, or vice versa?
That ability wasn't in 7th Edition Unix. It's fairly universal now,
but I dunno about some of the older systems like Ultrix. Also, many
older System V Unixes called it SIGCLD instead of SIGCHLD, so there
will be some variance in the name (as opposed to the number). And
some Unix clones and/or variants don't have the signal at all.