autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: shouldn't it error?


From: Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: shouldn't it error?
Date: 12 Dec 2003 14:38:14 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Bob Lockie <address@hidden> writes:

> Shouldn't the following give an error about an unknown option
> "./configure --enable-debu=full"?

Actually this is explained in the Autoconf manual:

       `configure' scripts do not complain about
    `--enable-FEATURE' options that they do not support.  This
    behavior permits configuring a source tree containing
    multiple packages with a top-level `configure' script when
    the packages support different options, without spurious
    error messages about options that some of the packages
    support.  An unfortunate side effect is that option spelling
    errors are not diagnosed.  No better approach to this problem
    has been suggested so far.

-- 
"Because computer source code is an expressive means for the exchange
 of information and ideas about computer programming, we hold that it
 is protected by the First Amendment."
--Hon. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., for the 6th Circuit Court, Junger vs. Daley





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]