Re: OT - Packages maintaining source for systems no longersupported [WAS: Re: Portability of preprocessor directives]

[Thomas E. Dickey]

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Earnie Boyd wrote:

> Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 08:27:21AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>What do you consider a hobbyist system?
> >>
> >>One that the vendor no longer supports and supplies fixes for and I as a
> >>maintainer of the software no longer have no access to test it myself.
> >>If it's not even tested how can it be used?  It has a high probability
> >>of not working anyway!
> >
> >
> > bear in mind that Ernie's frame of reference is that anything older than
> > a year is probably too far into the past to consider (look at his webpage
> > for an example of his notion of "support").
> >
>
> Which webpage would that be?

cygwin & mingw32

-- 
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net