|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: Faster AT_CHECK, one less XFAIL |
Date: | Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:49:11 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) |
Eric Blake wrote: > Now that m4_expand is more robust, I switched AT_CHECK to start using it. > I had to fix a bit of fallout - a grand total of two tests (one with > unbalanced '(' Should we warn about that? Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |