autoconf-archive-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

COPYRIGHT file


From: Peter Johansson
Subject: COPYRIGHT file
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:51:26 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)

Hi Peter,

I noted your commit to add COPYING to target maintainer-clean:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf-archive.git;a=commit;f=Makefile.am;hb=92d4b0359d6fa12a6ee41056e879dd4087cc6d8d

I don't think that is a very good idea. In fact I think COPYING should be committed into git in order to make it clear under which version of GPL the project is licensed. It's true that automake can create a COPYING file if it's missing, but it's dangerous because the COPYING file be different depending on which version of automake that is used. Automake prior version 1.10.2 creates a GPLv2 COPYING whereas 1.10.2 and newer creates a GPLv3 COPYING file.

This has been discussed quite a lot on the automake list; see, for example, this thread in which Karl Berry explains why it is a bad idea not to commit the COPYING file to the version control repository:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2008-12/msg00021.html

The conclusion was to add a warning when automake creates the file. If you let automake create the COPYING file with a recent automake, you will notice that automake recommend you to commit the file to your VCS.

Cheers,
Peter




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]