Re: Merged branch with history

[Dustin J. Mitchell]

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Francesco
Salvestrini<address@hidden> wrote:
> ANYWAY: I like both approach (your and the Peter's one) and I simply state:
> which is the better one for both tasks (repository rearrangement, automatic
> history generation) ?

I think that mine is better for repository management (does not
require a forced push) and for history generation (maintains git
history)

Dustin

-- 
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com