Ken Brown <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Ken,
My main problem when compiling that patch was that there were a lot
of differences between Philips files and the AUCTeX CVS version that
didn't look Biber-related. Maybe that were general improvements and
fixes of the AUCTeX code, or maybe it was just an older AUCTeX
version he worked on. Since I couldn't judge that, I preferred the
stock AUCTeX versions in those cases.
My impression is that Philip's files were based on auctex-11.86, but
he could confirm. Based on that assumption, I did a 3-way merge
(using diff3) of Philip's files and CVS head, using auctex-11.86 as
common ancestor. My patches are different from yours in a few places.
Awesome, I guess your results will probably be more accurate than mine.
I don't want to waste everyone's time, so I'll do a little testing
before sending my patches to the list.