[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Re: Problem with Latex command-completion (M-TAB)

From: Ralf Angeli
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Re: Problem with Latex command-completion (M-TAB)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:05:44 +0200

* Ralf (2009-09-11) writes:

>> > Problem: The Latex complete-command macro (M-TAB) is only recognizing 
>> > a few commands. 
>> Yes, those which were made available with `TeX-add-symbols'.
>> > Examples:
>> > \secti completes to \section.
>> > \texti fails to complete to \textit, with error message "Can't find 
>> > completion for \texti".  In contrast, the Latex-insert-font macro 
>> > happily inserts \textit.
>> `TeX-font' uses a different source of information than
>> `TeX-complete-symbol'.
> Is there a way to get M-TAB command-completion to work automatically for 
> common LaTeX commands?  Or does the user need to manually define every 
> command using TeX-add-symbols?  That seems painful!  

The idea with `TeX-font' is that the font change commands are used quite
often and that direct access to them is faster than completion through
`M-TAB'.  What other "common LaTeX commands" do you miss when using


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]