Ralf Angeli a écrit :
Is the preprocessor code separated in some way from the rest of the
comment?
Yes it is, each line of the preprocessor code has some specific Eupp
start-mark, and some specfic Eupp end-mark
Then you could adapt `paragraph-separate' accordingly.
I don't think that this would be enough, because even though by some
tampering with variable `paragraph-separate' one line of preprocessor
code could be recognized as a single paragraph, this would not prevent
that this line may be folded into two lines if it is too long, which
would cause the absence of an Eupp end-mark for the first line, and of
an Eupp start mark for the second line. Also wouldn't it interfere
with some motion commands, making moving forward or backward a
paragraph go line by line when you step though some Eupp code ?
Anyhow, I have developped this new function, and it seems to be
working. I agree that some more testing may be wise, I have just
realised that I have not yet checked that the indent region as
paragraph does not go into an infinite loop in case that an unfillable
comment is on the last line of a buffer because the (beginning-of-line
2) would not make any action. I will check that and make you know
about it.
PS: Please don't forget to make me explicitly in "To" as I am not
subscribed to address@hidden
You know that you can read the list on Gmane?
Sorry for my ignorance:
1) is gmane a newsgroup or a Web access
2) what is the exact address to access mails from address@hidden
BR,
Vincent.