Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Fold citep

[Ralf Angeli]

* David Kastrup (2008-06-29) writes:

> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> * Ralf Angeli (2008-05-31) writes:
>>
>>> I'm not sure if this is flexible enough.  The scheme does not cater for
>>> the situation where one wants to use a completely different string if
>>> the optional argument is not found.  For example for "\item[foo]" you
>>> might wanna display "foo:" but for "\item" just "*".
>>
>> I've now opted for a different scheme.  One can define complete
>> alternatives with a "||" separator.
>
> Is there a reason for using "||" instead of "|"?

People might want to use "|" in the display string and since there are
no provisions for escaping such a thing, I thought "||" would be safer
since people will likely not use it as often as a single "|".

-- 
Ralf