[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jul 2016 19:11:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 |
Hi Mosè,
Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
> 2016-07-08 12:55 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati <address@hidden>:
>>
>> Following up myself, I think I have a working setup for an AUCTeX ispell
>> dictionary (diff attached). I hope this way, it will be easy to add
>> more macro/env names. I would appreciate any comments. After that, I
>> will update the documentation and make it available.
Thanks for looking at this.
> Thanks for your work! Some questions:
>
> * why all those `eval-when-compile'?
The final regexp which goes into byte-compiled file is built with:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defvar TeX-ispell-skip-cmds-one-arg-regexp
(eval-when-compile
(concat "\\\\"
(regexp-opt (TeX-ispell-sort-skip-cmds-list 1) t)))
"Regexp of LaTeX commands with one argument to be skipped.")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I needed the other `eval-when-compile' to make the compiler happy.
Byte-compile `tex-ispell.el' and have a look at the .elc file.
> * why you decided to add all elements of `TeX-ispell-skip-cmds-list'
> in `tex-ispell.tex', instead of adding the appropriate macros in each
> style file? Performance?
I think on the long run with lots of macros, it will help. I did it
mainly because I wanted to feed `regexp-opt' with all the macros and
have one regexp to do the work. I started with the idea to have macros
in the respective style files, but the one-file-approach seems easier to
maintain. Parsed elements can still be added by styles with
`TeX-ispell-skip-set(car|cdr)'.
> * is is possible to skip the second
> argument of "\begin{}{}"? For example. in the first example you
> showed us in this thread `ispell' still wants to check "llr".
Yes it is. It works for me for tabularx & tabulary with (already in
the last diff):
(TeX-ispell-skip-setcdr
'(...
("tabular[xy]" ispell-tex-arg-end 2)))
I see that I have missed \begin{tabular*} (since I never use it ;-),
should be easily fixed with:
(TeX-ispell-skip-setcdr
'(...
("tabular[*xy]" ispell-tex-arg-end 2)))
Best, Arash
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Arash Esbati, 2016/07/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Arash Esbati, 2016/07/11
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/11
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, David Kastrup, 2016/07/11
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/11
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Arash Esbati, 2016/07/12
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, David Kastrup, 2016/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, David Kastrup, 2016/07/17