duplicity-talk archive search

301. [Duplicity-talk] BackupChain instance has no attribute 'archive_dir' (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:31:07 +0100

Hi, I use duplicity 0.4.1 under Debian and lately I get the following error when running it: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 358, in ? if __name__ == "__main__": ma

/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2006-02/msg00001.html (5,366 bytes)

302. [Duplicity-talk] Unique marketing idea gets paid_sign/ups in a week (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 00:55:17 +0300

"I got 30 join/ups this week using a $199USD d/dbase from Teem's mark/eting" - Florida "I had 117 inquiries and 15 paid_join/ups this week from Teem's d/bases" - New Zealand "I am getting a great res

/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2005-05/msg00020.html (8,249 bytes)

303. [Duplicity-talk] Falsche Adresse? (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:06:26 +0200

Guten Tag. Wir hatten Sie bereits vor einigen Wochen angeschrieben und wollten Kontakt mit Ihrem Marketing- oder EDV Leiter aufnehmen. Möglicherweise ist das Mail bei Ihnen oder bei uns verloren geg

/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2003-07/msg00008.html (4,116 bytes)

304. Re: [Duplicity-talk] cannot allocate memmory (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: 03 Feb 2003 08:13:19 +0000

I am using Gentoo Linux with Python 2.2.1 and Kernel 2.4.19 @ athlon xp, 512mb ram. btw: I just tried a backup to a local dir (file:///foo/) and got the same error. Boris

/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2003-02/msg00006.html (5,139 bytes)

305. Re: [Duplicity-talk] cannot allocate memmory (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 00:06:08 -0800

BB> hi, during large backups (cabout 15gb) I allways get a "cannot BB> allocate memmory" error. It looks like it wil happen during a BB> fork(). But I am pretty sure there is enough memmory. Hmm, be

/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2003-02/msg00005.html (5,439 bytes)

306. Re: [Duplicity-talk] Maybe a url redirect is in order (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:06:06 -0800

RB> The top google hit for 'duplicity' 'backup' is: RB> http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/duplicity/ which is no longer RB> valid. A HTTP redirect in place there might help to pull in RB> hits. Done.

/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2002-11/msg00015.html (4,835 bytes)

307. [Duplicity-talk] Maybe a url redirect is in order (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:12:29 -0600

The top google hit for 'duplicity' 'backup' is: http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/duplicity/ which is no longer valid. A HTTP redirect in place there might help to pull in hits. -- Ry4an Brase - http:

/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2002-11/msg00014.html (4,707 bytes)