duplicity-talk archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ google: 307 ]

Total 307 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: BZIP2 support on Mac OSX does not seem to work (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:22:50 +0200
Am 18.08.2010 17:37, schrieb Madhusudan Singh: The .tar.gpg should read .difftar.gpg. The question stands. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Madhusudan Singh <address@hidden> wrote: Hello, I am trying
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00054.html (8,218 bytes)

222. Re: [Duplicity-talk] BZIP2 support on Mac OSX does not seem to work (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:27:56 -0500
The google search did reveal that I should be getting .tar.bz2.gpg extensions. So, I do not know if my mac's version of duplicity is broken somehow (unlikely, since it passes on this task to gpg) or
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00053.html (8,731 bytes)

223. Re: [Duplicity-talk] BZIP2 support on Mac OSX does not seem to work (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:02:33 -0400
Those are man page arguments for gpg. But arguments to gpg will not change or set the filenames generated by duplicity? -Scott That is what I have found on googling. Are these options valid options f
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00052.html (7,410 bytes)

224. Re: [Duplicity-talk] BZIP2 support on Mac OSX does not seem to work (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:25:27 -0500
Uh... are you sure this relates to gpg-options ? ... doesn't have anything to do with GPG operations, I would say... Just guessing. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <address@hidden> http://www-public
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00051.html (7,968 bytes)

225. [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity friendly cloud storage services (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:00:09 +0200
Hi. I'm looking for options for remote backups on cloud storage services. I've found Amazon S3, but I'm looking for alternatives. I'm not so much eager to reinforcing monopolies in hosting my backups
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00049.html (5,110 bytes)

226. Re: [Duplicity-talk] BZIP2 support on Mac OSX does not seem to work (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:00:03 +0200
Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 09:57 -0500, Madhusudan Singh a écrit : Uh... are you sure this relates to gpg-options ? ... doesn't have anything to do with GPG operations, I would say... Just guessin
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00048.html (7,041 bytes)

227. [Duplicity-talk] Re: BZIP2 support on Mac OSX does not seem to work (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:37:45 -0500
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00043.html (7,800 bytes)

228. [Duplicity-talk] BZIP2 support on Mac OSX does not seem to work (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:57:16 -0500
Hello, I am trying to use duplicity (latest version and dependencies from MacPorts) to create .tar.bz2.gpg (compressed and encrypted) backups on a remote Linux server. I am using --gpg-options='--co
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-08/msg00041.html (7,321 bytes)

229. [Duplicity-talk] ANNOUNCING Tahoe, the Least-Authority File System, v1.7.0 (score: 5)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:46:14 -0700
Folks: Duplicity has a plugin that can use Tahoe-LAFS as a backend. In addition, Tahoe-LAFS itself has grown a "tahoe backup" command which accomplishes encrypted backup, like duplicity does, but wit
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-06/msg00011.html (11,938 bytes)

230. [Duplicity-talk] fix or avoid "Error accessing possibly locked file" (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:07:53 -0400
I've been using duplicity pretty happily for a few months. My main remaining problem is the errors which I always get on those 3 (and only those 3) files, which seem utterly unrelated to each other o
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-06/msg00009.html (5,712 bytes)

231. Re: [Duplicity-talk] Symbol not found: _rs_file_copy_cb on Mac OS X 10.6 (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:57:56 +0100
I tried this now, but it didn't give me enough. I hope someone will find a solution for OS X 10.6 to get Duplicity to compile and work. I sure miss it.
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-03/msg00074.html (7,230 bytes)

232. Re: [Duplicity-talk] Symbol not found: _rs_file_copy_cb on Mac OS X 10.6 (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:26:26 -0500
Google for 'rs_file_copy_cb' instead and you'll find lots of hits. I'm not familiar with Mac, so maybe that will help. ...Ken Attachment: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-03/msg00072.html (7,143 bytes)

233. Re: [Duplicity-talk] No secret key required on differential backups (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:58:13 +0100
Lluís Batlle schrieb: Hello Georg, I've never used a gpg-agent in that computer. I simply had a passphrase in the gpg secret key, and the backup command has been run every day since some weeks witho
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-02/msg00028.html (7,051 bytes)

234. [Duplicity-talk] Google Docs backend (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:59:15 -1000
Now that the file type restrictions have been removed, is anyone working on a backend to use a Google Docs account for storage? Philip
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-02/msg00019.html (3,930 bytes)

235. [Duplicity-talk] the big 'picture' --or-- how to keep just one revision. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:10:38 -0600
I've been trying to comprehend exactly how duplicity will work for me as I continue to make backups. I've been searching the web and the mailing list archives for either a graphical representation or
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2010-01/msg00063.html (6,266 bytes)

236. Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity scp vs. sftp (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:55:05 +0100
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:15:31 -0600, Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote: why sftp, yeah, upstream is always to low ;) but if duplicity runs it may affect other internet traffic so rate limiting it
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2009-11/msg00058.html (8,002 bytes)

237. Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity scp vs. sftp (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:15:31 -0600
I am not trying to force anyone to use duplicity, just to make it more secure. If that means using sftp over scp, then so be it. I suppose a commandline option would be the way to go, with the defaul
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2009-11/msg00057.html (7,497 bytes)

238. Re: [Duplicity-talk] Difference between s3 and s3+http URL schemes (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:05:09 -0600
Yes, its the other way around. My mistake. ...Ken Attachment: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2009-11/msg00004.html (6,570 bytes)

239. Re: [Duplicity-talk] Difference between s3 and s3+http URL schemes (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:08:34 +0100
Thanks for the quick response! But... isn't it the other way around (i.e. you supply the hostname for s3, not for s3+http)? That is what the examples seem to say, anyway. You're most welcome! -- Jesp
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2009-11/msg00003.html (6,166 bytes)

240. Re: [Duplicity-talk] Difference between s3 and s3+http URL schemes (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:45:55 -0600
There should not be any difference except that on the s3+http you supply the host name. The s3 protocol uses the default Amazon host, kind of a shortcut. Thanks for the pointer to the guide. ...Ken A
/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2009-11/msg00002.html (5,979 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu