This is not accurate. Axiom is open source and anyone can touch whatever they like in the Axiom code. The issue is more: What is the best thing to touch? We have discussed this is great detail over t
Yes, that was exactly my thought and I would like to try to get a start on it, having worked with both the TeXmacs and MathAction interfaces. However right now I feel a distinct lack of documentation
Actually there isn't a single thing that you could do in HyperDoc that you couldn't do in our TechExplorer-based Windows interface, and in practice the latter was much more natural to work with becau
Well, no, if you meant have I made a comparison study. Also, I was only referring to the TechExplorer browser plug-in and I should withdraw that general comment. Right now, that is only an impression
sman is (or will be) open source but as far as I know it has not yet been fully re-integrated. I believe that sman is necessary to manage the communication between axiom and auxillary programs like g
Dear Bill: Thanks for taking the time to send me links to discussion on hyperdoc. Unfortunately, (1) The search page produce no document: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=hyperdo
William, I greatly appreciate your discussion of hyperdoc. I think you are quite right to observe that open axiom is at a serious disadvantage because of the lack of this part of the former commercia
Error in that hyperlink. This one works for me: http://www.integretechpub.com/products/techexplorer/ Note: Licensing is free for personal use only: http://www.integretechpub.com/techexplorer/license/
*, I just received this announcement from Sam Dooley, one of the original authors of Axiom. He's been working with techexplorer which was originally a front end to Axiom. Tim, I am pleased to announc
Greetings! First of all, regarding the general question of whether gcl source should be bundled with axiom, I personally feel that whatever Tim feels is best should prevail here. There seem to be a f