rdiff-backup-users archive search

1. [rdiff-backup-users] Re: bug in 1.1.8/1.1.9 ? (score: 107)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:45:48 +0100

1.1.7 also works without a problem, so this problem may have been introduced between 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 searching for this error: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=AttributeError%

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-02/msg00014.html (8,861 bytes)

2. Re: [rdiff-backup-users] More patches to get rdiff-backup working undercygwin/windows (score: 100)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:12:21 -0500

Jeff, Did you apply the patches to both sides? This error looks like the result of the patches only being on one side. marc Today I saw the patches listed below and decided to give them a try. http:/

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-01/msg00085.html (12,217 bytes)

3. RE: [rdiff-backup-users] More patches to get rdiff-backup working undercygwin/windows (score: 100)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:12:48 -0500

I was getting Security Violation errors. This group indicated I needed to upgrade to 1.1.7. I did this, but still had the errors. Today I saw the patches listed below and decided to give them a try.

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-01/msg00084.html (11,470 bytes)

4. Re: [rdiff-backup-users] cygwin to cygwin still not working (score: 99)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:25:31 -0500

Jeff, Apply this patch to both sides: == -- fs_abilities.py.orig 2007-01-30 20:20:03.334625000 -0500 +++ fs_abilities.py 2007-01-30 20:20:09.772125000 -0500 @@ -629,6 +629,7 @@ def __init__(self, con

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-01/msg00112.html (12,002 bytes)

5. [rdiff-backup-users] cygwin to cygwin still not working (score: 99)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:13:42 -0500

I just upgraded both my cygwin computers to 1.1.9, but it still does not work completely. Should it work, or do I have some other problem specific to my installation? A copy of the output is below. a

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-01/msg00111.html (9,850 bytes)

6. [rdiff-backup-users] cygwin to cygwin still not working (score: 99)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:18:30 -0500

I just upgraded both my cygwin computers to 1.1.9, but it still does not work completely. Should it work, or do I have some other problem specific to my installation? A copy of the output is below. a

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-01/msg00110.html (9,983 bytes)

7. Re: [rdiff-backup-users] remove-older-than broken? (score: 70)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:45:14 -0800

Since this was originally reported on Fink's version, I rolled all commits in CVS HEAD since 1.1.9 into Fink's and MacPorts' rdiff-backup and rdiff-backup-devel packages, respectively. Regards, Blair

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-02/msg00081.html (13,354 bytes)

8. Re: [rdiff-backup-users] remove-older-than broken? (score: 70)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:16:55 -0500

Marc, I applied the patch in that e-mail, and the remove-older-than once again works. I then did a partial trial restore as a test to make sure the repository was still sane. Hopefully that patch, or

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-02/msg00072.html (12,783 bytes)

9. Re: [rdiff-backup-users] remove-older-than broken? (score: 70)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:35:14 -0500

Kevin, Now it is coming back to me... This was actually fixed last month, but at never made it into a release. It's in CVS head. Or you can look at this post: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/rdi

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-02/msg00070.html (12,144 bytes)

10. Re: [rdiff-backup-users] remove-older-than broken? (score: 70)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:29:55 -0500

I'm not using rdiff-backup on a remote machine. The backups are on a second hard drive, attached to the same machine as the hard drive with the data to be backed up. Only one instance of rdiff-backup

/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2007-02/msg00069.html (11,309 bytes)